In Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model, what does 'compromising' involve?

Compromising, as described in the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model, involves finding a middle ground where each party makes concessions to reach a mutually acceptable solution. This approach often results in a resolution that partially satisfies the needs of all involved parties, rather than fully meeting the needs of one or the other. Compromising is particularly effective in situations where time is limited or the conflict is of moderate importance, allowing for a quicker resolution while acknowledging the interests of all stakeholders.

This contrasts with the other approaches in the model. Satisfying only one’s own needs would align with a competing style, where one party prioritizes their interests over others. Seeking to fully satisfy all participants reflects a collaborating style, aimed at achieving a win-win outcome. Ignoring the conflict altogether pertains to an avoiding style, which does not address the issue at hand. Thus, the essence of compromising truly lies in balancing the needs and interests of all parties involved, exemplifying its nature as a middle ground.